lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20251007175343.107b17191734cddd7bbdeb54@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2025 17:53:43 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)"
 <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dev Jain
 <dev.jain@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: readahead: make thp readahead conditional to
 mmap_miss logic

On Tue, 07 Oct 2025 15:52:49 -0700 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev> wrote:

> >> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
> >> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
> >> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> >> Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
> >
> > But I'll slap the Fixes: in there, it might help someone.
> 
> I'd do exactly what you suggested: Fixes + no stable backport.
> 
> But I guess it still might end up in the LTS tree thanks to
> the automation picking up all fixes. Should be ok too.

They've been asked not to override the MM developers' decisions (ie, mm
is special).

I'm not sure how reliable this is...  And I'm not sure how they
identify the dont-do-that patches.  Maybe mm/*, maybe mm.git, maybe
s-o-b:akpm.  But I haven't seen any transgressions in a year or three.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ