[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875xcqi1sn.fsf@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 19:07:36 -0700
From: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)"
<willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Dev Jain
<dev.jain@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm: readahead: make thp readahead conditional to
mmap_miss logic
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2025 15:52:49 -0700 Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>
>> >> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
>> >> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>> >> Cc: Dev Jain <dev.jain@....com>
>> >
>> > But I'll slap the Fixes: in there, it might help someone.
>>
>> I'd do exactly what you suggested: Fixes + no stable backport.
>>
>> But I guess it still might end up in the LTS tree thanks to
>> the automation picking up all fixes. Should be ok too.
>
> They've been asked not to override the MM developers' decisions (ie, mm
> is special).
>
> I'm not sure how reliable this is... And I'm not sure how they
> identify the dont-do-that patches. Maybe mm/*, maybe mm.git, maybe
> s-o-b:akpm. But I haven't seen any transgressions in a year or three.
Nice! I didn't know this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists