linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: wm8978: add missing BCLK divider setup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAN7C2SBG2EZ4CJKR_vWKBGsKpZTF_9VJXj7ysLx38nJW3dFxeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 21:46:07 +0800
From: Sune Brian <briansune@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
	Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ASoC: wm8978: add missing BCLK divider setup

Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> 於 2025年10月8日 週三 下午9:40寫道：

> This is not OK, BCLK is 99 which is less than 100 so there are not
> enough BCLK cycles to clock the samples.

With all do respect.
This is not how IIS, left/right-just works my friend.
LRCLK and BCLK must follows.
This is no pure sample rate concept.
I hate to explain my self.
If this patch is not good I just give up.