[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5236e34ae036ce1ed808ff21c524caa1e67e1701.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 16:00:41 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
<tglx@...utronix.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "x86@...nel.org"
<x86@...nel.org>, "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com"
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, "xin@...or.com" <xin@...or.com>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "ardb@...nel.org" <ardb@...nel.org>,
"andrew.cooper3@...rix.com" <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com" <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>, "david.laight.linux@...il.com"
<david.laight.linux@...il.com>, "jpoimboe@...nel.org" <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>, "linux-efi@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "dwmw@...zon.co.uk"
<dwmw@...zon.co.uk>, "rdunlap@...radead.org" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"vegard.nossum@...cle.com" <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "kees@...nel.org"
<kees@...nel.org>, "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "peterz@...radead.org"
<peterz@...radead.org>, "geert@...ux-m68k.org" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 01/15] x86/cpu: Enumerate the LASS feature bits
On Wed, 2025-10-08 at 07:16 +0800, Xin Li wrote:
> >
> > I don't have a strong preference. I guess the inconsistency makes it
> > confusing as well. Will change it back to !X86_64 unless Xin objects.
>
> I prefer to use X86_32, which is more direct.
Fine by me, I was just noticing the asymmetry. I do think that anything like
that, that sticks out, is good to mention in the log.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists