[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c0d37604-edf7-4b9b-a3b2-9c5402ed579d@163.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 23:47:00 +0800
From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@....com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kwilczynski@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
helgaas@...nel.org, jingoohan1@...il.com, mani@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, gbayer@...ux.ibm.com,
lukas@...ner.de, arnd@...nel.org, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v15 6/6] PCI: cadence: Use cdns_pcie_find_*capability() to
avoid hardcoding offsets
On 2025/10/9 22:54, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:45:29PM +0800, Hans Zhang wrote:
>> @@ -249,9 +252,10 @@ static int cdns_pcie_ep_get_msi(struct pci_epc
>> *epc, u8 fn, u8 vfn)
>> {
>> struct cdns_pcie_ep *ep = epc_get_drvdata(epc);
>> struct cdns_pcie *pcie = &ep->pcie;
>> - u32 cap = CDNS_PCIE_EP_FUNC_MSI_CAP_OFFSET;
>> u16 flags, mme;
>> + u8 cap;
>>
>> + cap = cdns_pcie_find_capability(pcie, PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
>
> We should be passing PCI_CAP_ID_MSI, not PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX here, right?
>
Hi Sasha,
Yes, thank you very much for pointing it out. Sorry, it's my fault. I
will submit a patch to fix it.
Best regards,
Hans
Powered by blists - more mailing lists