[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87frbswnzg.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:09:07 +0200
From: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...nel.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Mattijs Korpershoek
<mkorpershoek@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Khairul Anuar Romli
<khairul.anuar.romli@...era.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: cadence-quadspi: Fix pm_runtime unbalance on dma
EPROBE_DEFER
Hi Dan,
Thank you for the review.
On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 18:33, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 03:38:39PM +0200, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
>> In csqspi_probe(), when cqspi_request_mmap_dma() returns -EPROBE_DEFER,
>> we handle the error by jumping to probe_setup_failed.
>> In that label, we call pm_runtime_disable(), even if we never called
>> pm_runtime_enable() before.
>>
>> Because of this, the driver cannot probe:
>>
>> [ 2.690018] cadence-qspi 47040000.spi: No Rx DMA available
>> [ 2.699735] spi-nor spi0.0: resume failed with -13
>> [ 2.699741] spi-nor: probe of spi0.0 failed with error -13
>>
>> Only call pm_runtime_disable() if it was enabled by adding a new
>> label to handle cqspi_request_mmap_dma() failures.
>>
>> Fixes: 04a8ff1bc351 ("spi: cadence-quadspi: fix cleanup of rx_chan on failure paths")
>> Signed-off-by: Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> This has been tested on a AM69 SK board.
>
> The patch seems correct, but the correct Fixes tag is:
> Fixes: b07f349d1864 ("spi: spi-cadence-quadspi: Fix pm runtime unbalance")
Right, I hesitated between the 04a8ff1bc351 and b07f349d1864. I will
send a v2 with an updated Fixes tag.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists