[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75011ead-8bd8-4939-ae7b-1c127eba8aa8@ixit.cz>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2025 15:32:22 +0200
From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Jessica Zhang <jessica.zhang@....qualcomm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] dt-bindings: panel: Add Samsung S6E3FC2X01 DDIC
with panel
On 09/10/2025 15:21, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 10:51:31AM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>> On 10/8/25 8:57 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 08, 2025 at 04:05:28PM +0200, David Heidelberg via B4 Relay wrote:
>>>> From: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
>>>>
>>>> Basic description for S6E3FC2X01 DDIC with attached panel AMS641RW.
>>>>
>>>> Samsung AMS641RW is 6.41 inch, 1080x2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio panel
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: David Heidelberg <david@...t.cz>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/display/panel/samsung,s6e3fc2x01.yaml | 78 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> MAINTAINERS | 5 ++
>>>> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please also describe, why it's not enough to use defined compatible,
>>> samsung,s6e3fc2x01. Why do we need a separate schema and can't use the
>>> panel-simple-dsi.yaml
>>
>> panel-simple works for 'dumb' (perhaps a harsh word for 'made with
>> just the in-spec DCS commands in mind') panels, but Samsungs are
>> widely known to require a ton of vendor magic
>
> The question is about the _schema_. I think it's fine to have a driver
> for a panel covered by panel-simple-dsi.yaml.
see display/panel/samsung,amoled-mipi-dsi.yaml
the OLED display don't fit well, but I wouldn't mind consolidating at
some point, but since we know very little (no datasheets), it's hard to
do for now. Maybe in the future when there will be more panels schemas,
we can find a way to consolidate into one big?
>
>>
>> Perhaps the original change was made with an "oh it just works
>> surely there's no drawbacks possible" attitude, as the panel
>> was left initialized by the bootloader
>
--
David Heidelberg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists