[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10802039-ca65-41c0-88fa-51db6d86aabd@iopsys.eu>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 08:01:59 +0300
From: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...sys.eu>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Ray Liu <ray.liu@...oha.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andreas Gnau <andreas.gnau@...sys.eu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 15/15] arm: dts: airoha: en7523: add SNAND node
On 11.10.2025 02:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/10/2025 22:45, Mikhail Kshevetskiy wrote:
>> Add SNAND node to enable support of attached SPI-NAND on the EN7523 SoC.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mikhail Kshevetskiy <mikhail.kshevetskiy@...sys.eu>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/airoha/en7523.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/airoha/en7523.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/airoha/en7523.dtsi
>> index b523a868c4ad..78e351eb787a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/airoha/en7523.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/airoha/en7523.dtsi
>> @@ -203,4 +203,25 @@ pcie_intc1: interrupt-controller {
>> #interrupt-cells = <1>;
>> };
>> };
>> +
>> + spi_ctrl: spi@...10000 {
>> + compatible = "airoha,en7581-snand";
> NAK, now I found this... Respond to comments instead of ignoring them.
>
> Three versions within few hours, that's not acceptable. Outside of the
> merge window the expectation is minimum 24h difference. Within merge
> window this is just spamming.
I already lost any hope to merge this to linux-3.18, so no problem.
Could you and Rob explain me this compatible issue? I got a feeling that
Rob telling me to keep "airoha,en7581-snand" compatible while you are
telling the opposite. As for me the use of "airoha,en7523-snand" or
maybe "airoha,en75xx-snand" for both en7523 & en7581 chips is the best.
Is there any policy? Could you provide a link?
Regards,
Mikhail Kshevetskiy
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists