[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <odjto4fjqoi5ct33unring22s3p6vwnbrafyrcmrppwcdnm4zq@aabot4m6q2rm>
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 14:11:48 +0300
From: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@...aro.org>
To: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jyothi Kumar Seerapu <jyothi.seerapu@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/24] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur: Add QUPv3 configuration
for serial engines
On 25-10-11 14:06:44, Abel Vesa wrote:
> On 25-09-25 12:02:12, Pankaj Patil wrote:
> > From: Jyothi Kumar Seerapu <jyothi.seerapu@....qualcomm.com>
> >
> > Add device tree support for QUPv3 serial engine protocols on Glymur.
> > Glymur has 24 QUP serial engines across 3 QUP wrappers, each with
> > support of GPI DMA engines.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jyothi Kumar Seerapu <jyothi.seerapu@....qualcomm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Patil <pankaj.patil@....qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts | 43 +
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi | 3041 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 2936 insertions(+), 148 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
> > index f1c5a0cb483670e9f8044e250950693b4a015479..8674465b22707207523caa8ad635d95a3396497a 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur.dtsi
> > @@ -707,6 +707,32 @@ gcc: clock-controller@...000 {
> > #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> > };
> >
> > + gpi_dma2: dma-controller@...000 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,glymur-gpi-dma", "qcom,sm6350-gpi-dma";
> > + reg = <0 0x00800000 0 0x60000>;
> > + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 588 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 589 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 590 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 591 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 592 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 593 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 594 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 595 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 596 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 597 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 598 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_SPI 599 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_ESPI 129 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_ESPI 130 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_ESPI 131 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> > + <GIC_ESPI 132 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > + dma-channels = <16>;
> > + dma-channel-mask = <0x3f>;
> > + #dma-cells = <3>;
> > + iommus = <&apps_smmu 0xd76 0x0>;
> > + status = "ok";
>
> s/ok/okay/
>
> Everywhere actually.
>
Actually no. Maybe drop entirely like Konrad already suggested.
But then everywhere else you do "ok" please replace with "okay",
otherwise dtbs_check complains.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists