lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMFSARdzoZrv4oXxVAYRcZJgxdLcrTMVAVGa=D8H=9c1vZ0zKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 17:10:13 -0700
From: Jameson Thies <jthies@...gle.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: akuchynski@...omium.org, abhishekpandit@...omium.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, 
	robh@...nel.org, bleung@...omium.org, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, 
	ukaszb@...omium.org, tzungbi@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, 
	chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] usb: typec: cros_ec_ucsi: Load driver from OF and
 ACPI definitions

Hi Dmitry,
on early ChromeOS devices using this driver it gets added as a
subdevice of the cros_ec_dev mfd. But, we want to change this to load
the device from OF/ACPI nodes. The issue here is that older devices
which don't define the OF/ACPI nodes to load cros_ec_ucsi will still
need to add the device through cros_ec_dev.

So cros_ec_ucsi needs to support multiple methods of being
instantiated, and going through cros_ec_dev creates an intermediary
device in the path which doesn't exist when the driver is loaded
through OF/ACPI. I'll add a comment explaining this in the v4 series.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ