lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <A0C349D1-C7FA-40C6-971B-910122B1AAE1@linux.dev>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 15:23:02 +0200
From: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@...ux.dev>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
 Ignat Korchagin <ignat@...udflare.com>,
 Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: asymmetric_keys - simplify
 asymmetric_key_hex_to_key_id

On 12. Oct 2025, at 14:10, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2025 at 08:52:21PM +0200, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>> Use struct_size() to calculate the number of bytes to allocate for the
>> asymmetric key id.
> 
> Why?  To what end?  To guard against an overflow?

I find struct_size() to be more readable because it explicitly
communicates the relationship between the flexible array member 'data'
and 'asciihexlen / 2', which the open-coded version doesn't.

'sizeof(struct asymmetric_key_id) + asciihexlen / 2' works because the
flexible array 'data' is an unsigned char (1 byte). This will probably
never change, but struct_size() would still work even if it did change
to a data type that isn't exactly 1 byte.

Additionally, struct_size() has some extra compile-time checks (e.g.,
__must_be_array()).

>> -	ret = __asymmetric_key_hex_to_key_id(id, match_id, asciihexlen / 2);
>> -	if (ret < 0) {
>> +	if (__asymmetric_key_hex_to_key_id(id, match_id, hexlen) < 0) {
>> 		kfree(match_id);
>> 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>> 	}
> 
> If anything, return ret instead of removing the ret variable.
> The only negative return value of __asymmetric_key_hex_to_key_id()
> is -EINVAL, hence that's returned directly here.

Ok, I'll change this in v2.

Thanks,
Thorsten


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ