[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b5dd3a3e-2420-4c7c-b690-3799fac14623@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 18:31:58 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Birger Koblitz <mail@...ger-koblitz.de>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ixgbe: Add 10G-BX support
> @@ -1678,6 +1679,26 @@ int ixgbe_identify_sfp_module_generic(struct ixgbe_hw *hw)
> else
> hw->phy.sfp_type =
> ixgbe_sfp_type_1g_bx_core1;
> + /* Support Ethernet 10G-BX, checking the Bit Rate
> + * Nominal Value as per SFF-8472 to be 12.5 Gb/s (67h) and
> + * Single Mode fibre with at least 1km link length
> + */
> + } else if ((!comp_codes_10g) && (bitrate_nominal == 0x67) &&
> + (!(cable_tech & IXGBE_SFF_DA_PASSIVE_CABLE)) &&
> + (!(cable_tech & IXGBE_SFF_DA_ACTIVE_CABLE))) {
> + status = hw->phy.ops.read_i2c_eeprom(hw,
> + IXGBE_SFF_SM_LENGTH,
> + &sm_length);
It seems like byte 15, Length (SMF), "Link length supported for single
mode fiber, units of 100 m" should be checked here. A 255 * 100m would
be more than 1Km, the condition you say in the comment.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists