linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/riscv: Add Zicbop prefetch test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251013-b0cf6d4c5952c56cd489eca9@orel>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 12:41:11 -0500
From: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
To: Yao Zihong <zihong.plct@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: alex@...ti.fr, alexghiti@...osinc.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu, 
	cleger@...osinc.com, evan@...osinc.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, palmer@...belt.com, 
	pjw@...nel.org, samuel.holland@...ive.com, shuah@...nel.org, 
	zhangyin2018@...as.ac.cn, zihongyao@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests/riscv: Add Zicbop prefetch test

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:16:41AM +0800, Yao Zihong wrote:
> Thanks for the review, I’ll fix those issues in the next revision.
> 
> Also, do you think it’s worth renaming cbo.c to something more generic
> (like zicbo.c), or should I keep the current name for consistency?

The cbo (cache-block operations) name represents all the cbo.*
instructions and all the prefetch.* instructions, just as section 2.2
"Cache-Block Operations" of the CMO spec introduces all of them under
the same heading.

Thanks,
drew