[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251013174222.90123-1-urezki@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 19:42:22 +0200
From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@...il.com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] vmalloc: Update __vmalloc_node_noprof() documentation
The kernel-doc for the __vmalloc_node_noprof() incorrectly states
that __GFP_NOFAIL reclaim modifier is not supported. In fact it has
been supported since commit 9376130c390a ("mm/vmalloc: add support
for __GFP_NOFAIL").
To avoid duplication and future drift, point this helper's doc to
__vmalloc_node_range_noprof() for details and the full description.
Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@...il.com>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index 9a63c91c6150..c31fa69cc530 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -4027,11 +4027,8 @@ void *__vmalloc_node_range_noprof(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
* Allocate enough pages to cover @size from the page level allocator with
* @gfp_mask flags. Map them into contiguous kernel virtual space.
*
- * Reclaim modifiers in @gfp_mask - __GFP_NORETRY, __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
- * and __GFP_NOFAIL are not supported
- *
- * Any use of gfp flags outside of GFP_KERNEL should be consulted
- * with mm people.
+ * Semantics of @gfp_mask(including reclaim/retry modifiers such as
+ * __GFP_NOFAIL) are the same as in __vmalloc_node_range_noprof().
*
* Return: pointer to the allocated memory or %NULL on error
*/
--
2.47.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists