[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DS0PR84MB374668EBA934375770E4A6CA9FEAA@DS0PR84MB3746.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 00:24:08 +0000
From: Jonathan Brophy <professor_jonny@...mail.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Jonathan Brophy
<professorjonny98@...il.com>, lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek
<pavel@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Radoslav Tsvetkov
<rtsvetkov@...dotech.eu>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] leds: Add Virtual Color LED Group driver
On FRI, 10 October 2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> + if (!ret) {
>> + vled->blink_delay_on = blink_interval;
>> + vled->blink_delay_off = blink_interval;
>> + }
>> +
>> + phandle_count = fwnode_property_count_u32(child_fwnode, "leds");
>
>
>No, don't mix OF and fwnode.
Thanks for the guidance I am working my way through the List if fixes and will offer a new patch set when complete.
Just one question is there a preference to use Device Tree (OF) functions or FWnode functions?
It is my under standing FWnode is newer and more universal.
Eg:
phandle_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(child, "leds", sizeof(u32));
Regards
Jonathan Brophy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists