[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14aec202-39a0-45fc-9d5f-20fb6806eca3@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 02:44:28 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Brophy <professor_jonny@...mail.com>,
Jonathan Brophy <professorjonny98@...il.com>, lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Radoslav Tsvetkov <rtsvetkov@...dotech.eu>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] leds: Add Virtual Color LED Group driver
On 13/10/2025 02:24, Jonathan Brophy wrote:
> On FRI, 10 October 2025, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> + vled->blink_delay_on = blink_interval;
>>> + vled->blink_delay_off = blink_interval;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + phandle_count = fwnode_property_count_u32(child_fwnode, "leds");
>>
>>
>> No, don't mix OF and fwnode.
>
> Thanks for the guidance I am working my way through the List if fixes and will offer a new patch set when complete.
>
> Just one question is there a preference to use Device Tree (OF) functions or FWnode functions?
> It is my under standing FWnode is newer and more universal.
I think fwnode is better, but my comment here was - choose one.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists