lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b58b2705-a1b4-4d71-8b76-e2bba4df6987@sifive.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 11:09:09 -0500
From: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>
To: Lucas Zampieri <lzampier@...hat.com>
Cc: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
 Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, Vivian Wang <dramforever@...e.com>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
 Zhang Xincheng <zhangxincheng@...rarisc.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] irqchip/plic: add support for UltraRISC DP1000
 PLIC

On 2025-10-14 10:40 AM, Lucas Zampieri wrote:
> From: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>
> 
> Add a new compatible for the plic found in UltraRISC DP1000 with a quirk to
> work around a known hardware bug with IRQ claiming in the UR-CP100 cores.
> 
> When claiming an interrupt on UR-CP100 cores, all other interrupts must be
> disabled before the claim register is accessed to prevent incorrect
> handling of the interrupt. This is a hardware bug in the CP100 core
> implementation, not specific to the DP1000 SoC.
> 
> When the PLIC_QUIRK_CLAIM_REGISTER is present, a specialized handler

You may want to name this something a bit more specific. Every PLIC has a claim
register, so it seems a bit weird saying that this is a quirk :)

Anyway, the code looks good, so:

Acked-by: Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>

> (plic_handle_irq_cp100) saves the enable state of all interrupts, disables
> all interrupts except for the first pending one before reading the claim
> register, and then restores the interrupts before further processing of
> the claimed interrupt continues.
> 
> The driver matches on "ultrarisc,cp100-plic" to apply the quirk to all
> SoCs using UR-CP100 cores, regardless of the specific SoC implementation.
> This has no impact on other platforms.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Zhang Xincheng <zhangxincheng@...rarisc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Xincheng <zhangxincheng@...rarisc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Zampieri <lzampier@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> index bf69a4802b71..1d528904b353 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,8 @@
>  #define CONTEXT_ENABLE_BASE		0x2000
>  #define     CONTEXT_ENABLE_SIZE		0x80
>  
> +#define PENDING_BASE                    0x1000
> +
>  /*
>   * Each hart context has a set of control registers associated with it.  Right
>   * now there's only two: a source priority threshold over which the hart will
> @@ -63,6 +65,7 @@
>  #define	PLIC_ENABLE_THRESHOLD		0
>  
>  #define PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT	0
> +#define PLIC_QUIRK_CLAIM_REGISTER	1
>  
>  struct plic_priv {
>  	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> @@ -394,6 +397,89 @@ static void plic_handle_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
>  }
>  
> +static bool cp100_isolate_pending_irq(int nr_irq_groups, u32 ie[],
> +				       void __iomem *pending,
> +				       void __iomem *enable)
> +{
> +	u32 pending_irqs = 0;
> +	int i, j;
> +
> +	/* Look for first pending interrupt */
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++) {
> +		pending_irqs = ie[i] & readl_relaxed(pending + i * sizeof(u32));
> +		if (pending_irqs)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!pending_irqs)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Disable all interrupts but the first pending one */
> +	for (j = 0; j < nr_irq_groups; j++) {
> +		u32 new_mask = 0;
> +
> +		if (j == i)
> +			/* Extract mask with lowest set bit */
> +			new_mask = (pending_irqs & -pending_irqs);
> +
> +		writel_relaxed(new_mask, enable + j * sizeof(u32));
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +static irq_hw_number_t cp100_get_hwirq(struct plic_handler *handler,
> +					void __iomem *claim)
> +{
> +	void __iomem *enable = handler->enable_base;
> +	void __iomem *pending = handler->priv->regs + PENDING_BASE;
> +	int nr_irqs = handler->priv->nr_irqs;
> +	int nr_irq_groups = DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_irqs, 32);
> +	int i;
> +	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = 0;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock(&handler->enable_lock);
> +
> +	/* Save current interrupt enable state */
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++)
> +		handler->enable_save[i] = readl_relaxed(enable + i * sizeof(u32));
> +
> +	if (!cp100_isolate_pending_irq(nr_irq_groups, handler->enable_save, pending, enable))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	hwirq = readl(claim);
> +
> +	/* Restore previous state */
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_irq_groups; i++)
> +		writel_relaxed(handler->enable_save[i], enable + i * sizeof(u32));
> +out:
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&handler->enable_lock);
> +	return hwirq;
> +}
> +
> +static void plic_handle_irq_cp100(struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +	struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
> +	struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +	void __iomem *claim = handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM;
> +	irq_hw_number_t hwirq;
> +
> +	WARN_ON_ONCE(!handler->present);
> +
> +	chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> +	while ((hwirq = cp100_get_hwirq(handler, claim))) {
> +		int err = generic_handle_domain_irq(handler->priv->irqdomain,
> +						    hwirq);
> +		if (unlikely(err)) {
> +			pr_warn_ratelimited("%pfwP: can't find mapping for hwirq %lu\n",
> +					    handler->priv->fwnode, hwirq);
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	chained_irq_exit(chip, desc);
> +}
> +
>  static void plic_set_threshold(struct plic_handler *handler, u32 threshold)
>  {
>  	/* priority must be > threshold to trigger an interrupt */
> @@ -430,6 +516,8 @@ static const struct of_device_id plic_match[] = {
>  	  .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT) },
>  	{ .compatible = "thead,c900-plic",
>  	  .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_EDGE_INTERRUPT) },
> +	{ .compatible = "ultrarisc,cp100-plic",
> +	  .data = (const void *)BIT(PLIC_QUIRK_CLAIM_REGISTER) },
>  	{}
>  };
>  
> @@ -664,12 +752,16 @@ static int plic_probe(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
>  		}
>  
>  		if (global_setup) {
> +			void (*handler_fn)(struct irq_desc *) = plic_handle_irq;
> +			if (test_bit(PLIC_QUIRK_CLAIM_REGISTER, &handler->priv->plic_quirks))
> +				handler_fn = plic_handle_irq_cp100;
> +
>  			/* Find parent domain and register chained handler */
>  			domain = irq_find_matching_fwnode(riscv_get_intc_hwnode(), DOMAIN_BUS_ANY);
>  			if (domain)
>  				plic_parent_irq = irq_create_mapping(domain, RV_IRQ_EXT);
>  			if (plic_parent_irq)
> -				irq_set_chained_handler(plic_parent_irq, plic_handle_irq);
> +				irq_set_chained_handler(plic_parent_irq, handler_fn);
>  
>  			cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_IRQ_SIFIVE_PLIC_STARTING,
>  					  "irqchip/sifive/plic:starting",


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ