[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251014134050.371d0c97@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:40:50 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir
Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS"
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE
TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: dsa: nxp,sja1105: Add optional
clock
On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 20:35:04 +0100 Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:02:13PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 19:12:23 +0100 Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > Hmm, I think this pw-bot command, intended for the dt patchwork has
> > > probably screwed with the state in the netdev patchwork. Hopefully I can
> > > fix that via
> >
> > The pw-bot commands are a netdev+bpf thing :) They won't do anything
> > to dt patchwork. IOW the pw-bot is a different bot than the one that
> > replies when patch is applied.
>
> Rob's recently added it to our patchwork too.
:-o Nice!
Do you know if it's the NIPA one or did he write his own?
I think we need to add support for some kind of project tagging
to avoid changing state in each other's patchworks?
pw-bot: xyz [project]
(with the [] brackets, not just meaning that the project is optional)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists