linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,pas: Document pas for Kaanapali SoCCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9813a47-c40b-475a-8faf-de0811c9066e@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 12:28:58 +0800
From: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com,
        trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com, yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,pas: Document pas for
 Kaanapali SoCCP



On 10/9/2025 6:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/09/2025 08:37, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>> +
>> +  glink-edge:
>> +    $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/qcom,glink-edge.yaml#
>> +    unevaluatedProperties: false
>> +    description: |
> 
> Drop |
> 
> 

Will fix

>> +      Qualcomm G-Link subnode which represents communication edge, channels
>> +      and devices related to the Remoteproc.
>> +
>> +required:
>> +  - compatible
>> +  - reg
>> +  - memory-region
>> +  - clocks
>> +  - clock-names
>> +  - interrupts
>> +  - interrupt-names
>> +  - qcom,smem-states
>> +  - qcom,smem-state-names
>> +
>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> 
> That's wrong in this context. But if you add missing (and corrected
> pas-common) then it would make sense.
> 

Sorry I didn't get this point, could you make it more clear?

The property for Kaanapali SoCCP doesn't follow qcom,pas-common.yaml
(the interrupts are different) so it was not included here, like
"qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pil.yaml"

So I think just adding the missing "power-domains","power-domain-names"
under "required" will be okay?

Thanks,
Jingyi

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof