linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,pas: Document pas for Kaanapali SoCCP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40af8d13-1bee-49f7-946e-043b920d83fe@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 06:47:21 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>,
 Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
 Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
 Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com, tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com,
 trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com, yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom,pas: Document pas for
 Kaanapali SoCCP

On 14/10/2025 06:28, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/9/2025 6:27 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 25/09/2025 08:37, Jingyi Wang wrote:
>>> +
>>> +  glink-edge:
>>> +    $ref: /schemas/remoteproc/qcom,glink-edge.yaml#
>>> +    unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> +    description: |
>>
>> Drop |
>>
>>
> 
> Will fix
> 
>>> +      Qualcomm G-Link subnode which represents communication edge, channels
>>> +      and devices related to the Remoteproc.
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - reg
>>> +  - memory-region
>>> +  - clocks
>>> +  - clock-names
>>> +  - interrupts
>>> +  - interrupt-names
>>> +  - qcom,smem-states
>>> +  - qcom,smem-state-names
>>> +
>>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>>
>> That's wrong in this context. But if you add missing (and corrected
>> pas-common) then it would make sense.
>>
> 
> Sorry I didn't get this point, could you make it more clear?
> 
> The property for Kaanapali SoCCP doesn't follow qcom,pas-common.yaml
> (the interrupts are different) so it was not included here, like
> "qcom,qcs404-cdsp-pil.yaml"


It should follow. We want the common properties to be common. You cannot
have new binding not using common properties, because you duplicate
property definition.

> 
> So I think just adding the missing "power-domains","power-domain-names"
> under "required" will be okay?


You need to adjust pas-common.yaml, all other bindings and this binding
so there is a common part.

Best regards,
Krzysztof