[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aO4Q0HIZ_72fwRI2@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 09:58:56 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de,
Dent Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] net: pse-pd: pd692x0: Preserve PSE
configuration across reboots
On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 04:05:33PM +0200, Kory Maincent wrote:
> From: Kory Maincent (Dent Project) <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
>
> Detect when PSE hardware is already configured (user byte == 42) and
> skip hardware initialization to prevent power interruption to connected
> devices during system reboots.
>
> Previously, the driver would always reconfigure the PSE hardware on
> probe, causing a port matrix reflash that resulted in temporary power
> loss to all connected devices. This change maintains power continuity
> by preserving existing configuration when the PSE has been previously
> initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
Hi Kory,
Perhaps I'm over thinking things here. But I'm wondering
what provision there is for a situation whereby:
1. The driver configures the device
2. A reboot occurs
2. The (updated) driver wants to (re)configure the device
with a different configuration, say because it turns
out there was a bug in or enhancement to the procedure at 1.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists