linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net] dpll: zl3073x: Handle missing or corrupted flash configuration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aO4RErH2NCOdMdhW@horms.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 10:00:02 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Prathosh Satish <Prathosh.Satish@...rochip.com>,
	Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
	Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
	open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] dpll: zl3073x: Handle missing or corrupted flash
 configuration

On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 05:28:02PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 10:15:05 +0100 Simon Horman wrote:
> > I am unsure how much precedence there is for probing a device
> > with very limited functionality like this.
> 
> Off the top of my head some Intel and Meta drivers do it already, IIRC.

Thanks, I think that is sufficient to allay my minor doubts here.