linux-kernel - Re: gpio: gpio-pci-idio-16 regression after LTS upgrade

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <DDI0AO1RKDJK.1M31TW8HEJHFU@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 13:25:24 +0200
From: "Michael Walle" <mwalle@...nel.org>
To: "Ioana Ciornei" <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Cc: "William Breathitt Gray" <wbg@...nel.org>, "Mark Cave-Ayland"
 <mark.caveayland@...anix.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <brgl@...ev.pl>,
 <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>, <broonie@...nel.org>,
 <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gpio: gpio-pci-idio-16 regression after LTS upgrade

On Tue Oct 14, 2025 at 1:21 PM CEST, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
>> To fix the regression, I guess the patch can then be picked up by the
>> stable team along with the driver patch which will set the
>> .fixed_direction_output config field.
>
> Just to make sure that I understand, do you want me to add another patch
> that adds the new driver user or that will be handled separately?

No, no. No new patch. It's just that your patch (just the one which
has that property added to gpio-regmap) has to be submitted to the stable
kernels (by the one who is fixing the regression) I guess.

-michael

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (298 bytes)