[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63ersts3bg5v2sm4sem357wi7oguslbj7mictb4xwfkuo56uak@qqmqehv6cowf>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 14:40:13 +0300
From: Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
To: Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>
Cc: William Breathitt Gray <wbg@...nel.org>,
Mark Cave-Ayland <mark.caveayland@...anix.com>, linus.walleij@...aro.org, brgl@...ev.pl,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, broonie@...nel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: gpio: gpio-pci-idio-16 regression after LTS upgrade
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 01:25:24PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> On Tue Oct 14, 2025 at 1:21 PM CEST, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> >> To fix the regression, I guess the patch can then be picked up by the
> >> stable team along with the driver patch which will set the
> >> .fixed_direction_output config field.
> >
> > Just to make sure that I understand, do you want me to add another patch
> > that adds the new driver user or that will be handled separately?
>
> No, no. No new patch. It's just that your patch (just the one which
> has that property added to gpio-regmap) has to be submitted to the stable
> kernels (by the one who is fixing the regression) I guess.
Ok, understood.
Ioana
Powered by blists - more mailing lists