[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251015231928.GC3943617@ax162>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 16:19:28 -0700
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Schier <nicolas.schier@...ux.dev>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 4/4] tracing: Add warnings for unused tracepoints for
modules
Hi Steve,
On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 04:38:46PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.modfinal b/scripts/Makefile.modfinal
> index 542ba462ed3e..6f909979af91 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.modfinal
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.modfinal
> @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ ccflags-remove-y := $(CC_FLAGS_CFI)
> .module-common.o: $(srctree)/scripts/module-common.c FORCE
> $(call if_changed_rule,cc_o_c)
>
> +ifneq ($(WARN_ON_UNUSED_TRACEPOINTS),"")
Drop the "", nowhere else in Kbuild appears to do this.
> +cmd_check_tracepoint = ${objtree}/scripts/tracepoint-update $<;
Please use $(objtree) to be consistent with the rest of Kbuild.
> +else
> +cmd_check_tracepoint =
> +endif
> +
> quiet_cmd_ld_ko_o = LD [M] $@
> cmd_ld_ko_o = \
> $(LD) -r $(KBUILD_LDFLAGS) \
> @@ -57,6 +63,7 @@ if_changed_except = $(if $(call newer_prereqs_except,$(2))$(cmd-check), \
> ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF_MODULES
> +$(if $(newer-prereqs),$(call cmd,btf_ko))
> endif
> + +$(call cmd,check_tracepoint)
>
> targets += $(modules:%.o=%.ko) $(modules:%.o=%.mod.o) .module-common.o
>
> diff --git a/scripts/tracepoint-update.c b/scripts/tracepoint-update.c
> index 6ec30f39d0ad..7e068de9c7f1 100644
> --- a/scripts/tracepoint-update.c
> +++ b/scripts/tracepoint-update.c
> @@ -188,6 +188,13 @@ static int process_tracepoints(void *addr, char const *const fname)
> }
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Modules may not have either section. But if it has one section,
> + * it should have both of them.
> + */
> + if (!check_data_sec && !tracepoint_data_sec)
> + return 0;
> +
This feels like it could be its own patch but I guess it does not make
much sense without enablement. It might be worth calling this out a bit
more in the commit message.
> if (!check_data_sec) {
> fprintf(stderr, "no __tracepoint_check in file: %s\n", fname);
> return -1;
> --
> 2.51.0
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists