linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: dsa: nxp,sja1105: Add optional clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251014181302.44537f00@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2025 18:13:02 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Andrew
 Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
 Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor
 Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS"
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE
 TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: dsa: nxp,sja1105: Add optional
 clock

On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:48:07 -0500 Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 08:35:04PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:02:13PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:  
> > > The pw-bot commands are a netdev+bpf thing :) They won't do anything
> > > to dt patchwork. IOW the pw-bot is a different bot than the one that
> > > replies when patch is applied.  
> > 
> > Rob's recently added it to our patchwork too.  
> 
> And the issue is that both PW projects might get updated and both don't 
> necessarily want the same state (like this case). So we need to 
> distinguish. Perhaps like one of the following:
> 
> dt-pw-bot: <state>
> 
> or
> 
> pw-bot: <project> <state>

We crossed replies, do you mind

  pw-bot: xyz [project]

? I like the optional param after required, and the brackets may help
us disambiguate between optional params if there are more in the future.