linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: dsa: nxp,sja1105: Add optional clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+SSiMCbGvbYcrS1mGUJOakqZF=gZOJ4iC=Y5LbcfTAUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 06:53:01 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@....com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, 
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, 
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	"open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, 
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, 
	imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dt-bindings: net: dsa: nxp,sja1105: Add optional clock

On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 8:13 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Oct 2025 15:48:07 -0500 Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 08:35:04PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 12:02:13PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > The pw-bot commands are a netdev+bpf thing :) They won't do anything
> > > > to dt patchwork. IOW the pw-bot is a different bot than the one that
> > > > replies when patch is applied.
> > >
> > > Rob's recently added it to our patchwork too.
> >
> > And the issue is that both PW projects might get updated and both don't
> > necessarily want the same state (like this case). So we need to
> > distinguish. Perhaps like one of the following:
> >
> > dt-pw-bot: <state>
> >
> > or
> >
> > pw-bot: <project> <state>
>
> We crossed replies, do you mind
>
>   pw-bot: xyz [project]
>
> ? I like the optional param after required, and the brackets may help
> us disambiguate between optional params if there are more in the future.

That's fine. Though it will be optional for you, but not us? We have
to ignore tags without the project if tags intended for netdev are
continued without the project. Or does no project mean I want to
update every project?

I also considered looking at who the email is from and restricting it
to the maintainers. I know the netdev one doesn't do that either
because I used it a couple of times. :) It does seem like it could be
abused.

Rob