lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef452c01679bee2c8bdbefe1df4775c432f8b345.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 11:36:20 +0100
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, 
 Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,  Marcelo Schmitt
 <marcelo.schmitt@...log.com>, Michael Hennerich
 <michael.hennerich@...log.com>, Nuno Sá	
 <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Andy Shevchenko	
 <andy@...nel.org>
Cc: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...ux.dev>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] iio: adc: ad7380: Add support for multiple SPI buses

On Tue, 2025-10-14 at 17:02 -0500, David Lechner wrote:
> Add support for multiple SPI buses to increase throughput. The AD7380
> family of ADCs have multiple SDO lines on the chip that can be used to
> read each channel on a separate SPI bus. If wired up to a SPI controller
> that supports it, the driver will now take advantage of this feature.
> This allows reaching the maximum sample rate advertised in the datasheet
> when combined with SPI offloading.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>
> ---

One minor thing. With it,

Reviewed-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>

>  drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c
> index
> bfd908deefc0f40b42bd8a44bfce7a2510b2fdf1..36abe95852006a81f7e31f8034699e59292a
> f79e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7380.c
> @@ -77,8 +77,7 @@
>  #define AD7380_CONFIG1_REFSEL		BIT(1)
>  #define AD7380_CONFIG1_PMODE		BIT(0)
>  
> -#define AD7380_CONFIG2_SDO2		GENMASK(9, 8)
> -#define AD7380_CONFIG2_SDO		BIT(8)
> +#define AD7380_CONFIG2_SDO		GENMASK(9, 8)
>  #define AD7380_CONFIG2_RESET		GENMASK(7, 0)
>  
>  #define AD7380_CONFIG2_RESET_SOFT	0x3C
> @@ -92,11 +91,6 @@
>  #define T_CONVERT_X_NS 500		/* xth conversion start time
> (oversampling) */
>  #define T_POWERUP_US 5000		/* Power up */
>  
> -/*
> - * AD738x support several SDO lines to increase throughput, but driver
> currently
> - * supports only 1 SDO line (standard SPI transaction)
> - */
> -#define AD7380_NUM_SDO_LINES		1
>  #define AD7380_DEFAULT_GAIN_MILLI	1000
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1084,7 +1078,7 @@ static int ad7380_set_ch(struct ad7380_state *st,
> unsigned int ch)
>  	if (oversampling_ratio > 1)
>  		xfer.delay.value = T_CONVERT_0_NS +
>  			T_CONVERT_X_NS * (oversampling_ratio - 1) *
> -			st->chip_info->num_simult_channels /
> AD7380_NUM_SDO_LINES;
> +			st->chip_info->num_simult_channels / st->spi-
> >num_data_bus;
>  
>  	return spi_sync_transfer(st->spi, &xfer, 1);
>  }
> @@ -1113,7 +1107,7 @@ static int ad7380_update_xfers(struct ad7380_state *st,
>  	if (oversampling_ratio > 1)
>  		t_convert = T_CONVERT_0_NS + T_CONVERT_X_NS *
>  			(oversampling_ratio - 1) *
> -			st->chip_info->num_simult_channels /
> AD7380_NUM_SDO_LINES;
> +			st->chip_info->num_simult_channels / st->spi-
> >num_data_bus;
>  
>  	if (st->seq) {
>  		xfer[0].delay.value = xfer[1].delay.value = t_convert;
> @@ -1124,6 +1118,7 @@ static int ad7380_update_xfers(struct ad7380_state *st,
>  			AD7380_SPI_BYTES(scan_type) *
>  			st->chip_info->num_simult_channels;
>  		xfer[3].rx_buf = xfer[2].rx_buf + xfer[2].len;
> +		xfer[3].multi_bus_mode = xfer[2].multi_bus_mode;

Why not doing the above once during probe?

- Nuno Sá


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ