[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9ca5a40c-1e9b-426d-8525-b1da39599731@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 09:15:32 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kaplan, David" <David.Kaplan@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 40/56] x86/alternative: Use sync_core_nmi_safe()
On 10/16/25 08:34, Kaplan, David wrote:
>> BTW, will AMD do that SERIALIZE instruction?
> It is not supported on current parts, I can't comment on future ones.
I think that was Peter's nice way of asking AMD to go implement
SERIALIZE. ;)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists