[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251016162716.GDaPEc5NWGAHq5n6VV@fat_crate.local>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:27:16 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: "Kaplan, David" <David.Kaplan@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 40/56] x86/alternative: Use sync_core_nmi_safe()
On Thu, Oct 16, 2025 at 09:15:32AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 10/16/25 08:34, Kaplan, David wrote:
> >> BTW, will AMD do that SERIALIZE instruction?
> > It is not supported on current parts, I can't comment on future ones.
>
> I think that was Peter's nice way of asking AMD to go implement
> SERIALIZE. ;)
Why does it matter?
:-P
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists