[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPFFtvFwgkPCdw-_@lx-t490>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 21:21:26 +0200
From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@...utronix.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
x86-cpuid@...ts.linux.dev, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/35] ASoC: Intel: avs: Include CPUID header at file
scope
On Thu, 16 Oct 2025, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Why are we even bothering with !CONFIG_X86?
>
> Because this thing has || COMPILE_TEST in Kconfig.
>
> But this thing gets enough compile testing on x86 already so why not
> simply drop the whole unnecessary gunk?
>
Makes sense; will do.
Thanks!
Ahmed
Powered by blists - more mailing lists