[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ae8a9d4-7c91-450c-904c-76264e211624@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 14:40:53 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Reshetova, Elena" <elena.reshetova@...el.com>
Cc: "jarkko@...nel.org" <jarkko@...nel.org>,
"seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "Mallick, Asit K"
<asit.k.mallick@...el.com>,
"Scarlata, Vincent R" <vincent.r.scarlata@...el.com>,
"Cai, Chong" <chongc@...gle.com>, "Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
"Annapurve, Vishal" <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
"Bondarevska, Nataliia" <bondarn@...gle.com>,
"Raynor, Scott" <scott.raynor@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 2/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add X86_FEATURE_SGX_EUPDATESVN
feature flag
On 10/15/25 23:38, Reshetova, Elena wrote:
> Sure, will do, thanks!
> Previous version was based on x86_tip/master
Just FWIW, that means very little. During the merge window it should
_mostly_ be gunk that's already gone up for -rc1. But it might also
contain cruft that _didn't_ go up and needs another cycle.
Please just base things on a tag in Linus's tree unless you have an
explicit, known, called-out-in-your-changelog dependency on something in
tip.
tl;dr: Basing on tip/x86/master was a bug here, not a feature.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists