[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46776a87-8038-42b3-8982-0cf83f8ba1c5@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 10:54:20 +0300
From: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
To: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>, Robert Foss
<rfoss@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com,
tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com, trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com,
yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com, Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>,
Atiya Kailany <atiya.kailany@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document Kaanapali
compatible
On 10/16/25 04:56, Hangxiang Ma wrote:
> On 10/16/2025 3:30 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>
>> On 10/15/25 05:56, Hangxiang Ma wrote:
>>> Add Kaanapali compatible consistent with CAMSS CCI interfaces. The list
>>> of clocks for Kaanapali requires its own compat string 'cam_top_ahb',
>>> aggregated into 'qcom,qcm2290-cci' node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml | 6 +++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
>>> index 9bc99d736343..0140c423f6f4 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties:
>>> - items:
>>> - enum:
>>> + - qcom,kaanapali-cci
>>> - qcom,qcm2290-cci
>>> - qcom,sa8775p-cci
>>> - qcom,sc7280-cci
>>> @@ -128,6 +129,7 @@ allOf:
>>> compatible:
>>> contains:
>>> enum:
>>> + - qcom,kaanapali-cci
>>> - qcom,qcm2290-cci
>>> then:
>>> properties:
>>> @@ -136,7 +138,9 @@ allOf:
>>> maxItems: 2
>>> clock-names:
>>> items:
>>> - - const: ahb
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - ahb
>>> + - cam_top_ahb
>>
>> Why is not to give the clock "ahb" name like on QCM2290?
>>
>> On QCM2290 the macro in front of the vlaue is GCC_CAMSS_TOP_AHB_CLK,
>> and name "ahb" is good for both, I believe.
>>
>>> - const: cci
>>> - if:
>>>
>>
>
> On Kaanapali the macro has been changed to CAM_CC_CAM_TOP_AHB_CLK. GCC
> clock domain doesn't manage the AHB clock but CAMCC does. I think it's
> better to create a new and more complete clock name to denote the
> differences between them.
Remember that you do not match the macro value here. Please provide an
explanation why the intorduced "cam_top_ahb" is anyhow better than the
already exisitng "ahb" name, or please stick to the existing name.
--
Best wishes,
Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists