[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <abc9d825-1e98-4838-9e9c-ca18ba191e11@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 09:56:36 +0200
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@....qualcomm.com>,
Robert Foss
<rfoss@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Todor Tomov <todor.too@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, aiqun.yu@....qualcomm.com,
tingwei.zhang@....qualcomm.com, trilok.soni@....qualcomm.com,
yijie.yang@....qualcomm.com,
Jingyi Wang <jingyi.wang@....qualcomm.com>,
Atiya Kailany <atiya.kailany@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] dt-bindings: i2c: qcom-cci: Document Kaanapali
compatible
On 10/16/25 3:56 AM, Hangxiang Ma wrote:
> On 10/16/2025 3:30 AM, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>
>> On 10/15/25 05:56, Hangxiang Ma wrote:
>>> Add Kaanapali compatible consistent with CAMSS CCI interfaces. The list
>>> of clocks for Kaanapali requires its own compat string 'cam_top_ahb',
>>> aggregated into 'qcom,qcm2290-cci' node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hangxiang Ma <hangxiang.ma@....qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml | 6 +++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
>>> index 9bc99d736343..0140c423f6f4 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/qcom,i2c-cci.yaml
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties:
>>> - items:
>>> - enum:
>>> + - qcom,kaanapali-cci
>>> - qcom,qcm2290-cci
>>> - qcom,sa8775p-cci
>>> - qcom,sc7280-cci
>>> @@ -128,6 +129,7 @@ allOf:
>>> compatible:
>>> contains:
>>> enum:
>>> + - qcom,kaanapali-cci
>>> - qcom,qcm2290-cci
>>> then:
>>> properties:
>>> @@ -136,7 +138,9 @@ allOf:
>>> maxItems: 2
>>> clock-names:
>>> items:
>>> - - const: ahb
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - ahb
>>> + - cam_top_ahb
>>
>> Why is not to give the clock "ahb" name like on QCM2290?
>>
>> On QCM2290 the macro in front of the vlaue is GCC_CAMSS_TOP_AHB_CLK,
>> and name "ahb" is good for both, I believe.
>>
>>> - const: cci
>>> - if:
>>>
>>
>
> On Kaanapali the macro has been changed to CAM_CC_CAM_TOP_AHB_CLK. GCC clock domain doesn't manage the AHB clock but CAMCC does. I think it's better to create a new and more complete clock name to denote the differences between them.
Are there any other "AHB" clocks going to this block?
If not, then this is more confusing instead
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists