[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025101740-cognition-stoplight-c8e6@gregkh>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:40:51 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
Cc: Tim Guttzeit <t.guttzeit@...edocomputers.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb/core/quirks: Add Huawei ME906S to wakeup quirk
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 04:33:03PM +0200, Werner Sembach wrote:
> From: Tim Guttzeit <t.guttzeit@...edocomputers.com>
>
> The list of Huawei LTE modules needing the quirk fixing spurious wakeups
> was missing the IDs of the Huawei ME906S module, therefore suspend did not
> work.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Guttzeit <t.guttzeit@...edocomputers.com>
> Signed-off-by: Werner Sembach <wse@...edocomputers.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/core/quirks.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/quirks.c b/drivers/usb/core/quirks.c
> index f5bc538753301..47f589c4104a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/core/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/quirks.c
> @@ -467,6 +467,8 @@ static const struct usb_device_id usb_quirk_list[] = {
> /* Huawei 4G LTE module */
> { USB_DEVICE(0x12d1, 0x15bb), .driver_info =
> USB_QUIRK_DISCONNECT_SUSPEND },
> + { USB_DEVICE(0x12d1, 0x15c1), .driver_info =
> + USB_QUIRK_DISCONNECT_SUSPEND },
> { USB_DEVICE(0x12d1, 0x15c3), .driver_info =
> USB_QUIRK_DISCONNECT_SUSPEND },
>
> --
> 2.43.0
>
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you
did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version.
Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the
kernel file, Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst for what
needs to be done here to properly describe this.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot
Powered by blists - more mailing lists