[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ceec6c5-a912-494c-852f-1075644ccb74@lunn.ch>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 16:40:47 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Buday Csaba <buday.csaba@...lan.hu>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] net: mdio: reset PHY before attempting to access
registers in fwnode_mdiobus_register_phy
On Fri, Oct 17, 2025 at 09:33:58AM +0200, Buday Csaba wrote:
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> I am about the submit the v3 version of these patches, hopefully the last
> iteration. I think I managed to elimante all failures and almost all of
> the warnings, except one: patchwork complies, that not all the maintainers
> are CC'ed.
>
> I have used get_maintainers.pl to get the address list. I am on the
> net-next tree. Is there a problem with get_maintainers.pl or with
> patchwork? Can I ignore that warning?
patchwork might be passing additional parameters to
get_maintainers.pl. These tests are not go/no-go. We look at the
results and evaluate what they are saying. Missing
p.zabel@...gutronix.de is not a big issue.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists