[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPKxBh14fxnVIXK+@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 14:11:34 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
CC: <will@...nel.org>, <jgg@...dia.com>, <oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev>,
<jean-philippe@...aro.org>, <robin.murphy@....com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<balbirs@...dia.com>, <miko.lenczewski@....com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, <praan@...gle.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate smmu_domain->invs
when attaching masters
On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 12:03:27AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
> >> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3208:33: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces) @@ expected struct arm_smmu_invs **invs_ptr @@ got struct arm_smmu_invs [noderef] __rcu ** @@
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3208:33: sparse: expected struct arm_smmu_invs **invs_ptr
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c:3208:33: sparse: got struct arm_smmu_invs [noderef] __rcu **
...
> > 3208 invst->invs_ptr = &new_smmu_domain->invs;
...
> > 3247 rcu_assign_pointer(*invst->invs_ptr, invst->new_invs);
Looks like we need:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index 8906c1625f428..398d8beb8f862 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static inline bool arm_smmu_master_canwbs(struct arm_smmu_master *master)
* to_unref argument to an arm_smmu_invs_unref() call
*/
struct arm_smmu_inv_state {
- struct arm_smmu_invs **invs_ptr;
+ struct arm_smmu_invs __rcu **invs_ptr;
struct arm_smmu_invs *old_invs;
struct arm_smmu_invs *new_invs;
};
Will fix in v4.
Thanks
Nicolin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists