[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPZNQ0s8n-QOPhp2@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 15:54:59 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vc_screen: move __free() handler that frees a page
to a common header
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 05:30:55PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> vc_screen defines __free() handler that frees a page using free_page().
> Move that definition to include/linux/gfp.h next to free_page() and
> rename it from free_page_ptr to free_page.
I don't think this is a good idea. This is a bad interface and we
should be moving people away from it, not making it easier to use.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists