[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2025102026-unopened-equal-764c@gregkh>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 17:12:48 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, vc_screen: move __free() handler that frees a page
to a common header
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 05:30:55PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@...nel.org>
>
> vc_screen defines __free() handler that frees a page using free_page().
> Move that definition to include/linux/gfp.h next to free_page() and
> rename it from free_page_ptr to free_page.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c | 6 ++----
> include/linux/gfp.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c b/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
> index c814644ef4ee..d2029f029de6 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/vt/vc_screen.c
> @@ -53,8 +53,6 @@
> #define HEADER_SIZE 4u
> #define CON_BUF_SIZE (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BASE_SMALL) ? 256 : PAGE_SIZE)
>
> -DEFINE_FREE(free_page_ptr, void *, if (_T) free_page((unsigned long)_T));
> -
> /*
> * Our minor space:
> *
> @@ -371,7 +369,7 @@ vcs_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> loff_t pos;
> bool viewed, attr, uni_mode;
>
> - char *con_buf __free(free_page_ptr) = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
> + char *con_buf __free(free_page) = (char *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
As per the other thread recently, why can't we just use kmalloc() here
instead?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists