linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: spi: fsl-qspi: support SpacemiT K1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <710c36f2-3551-4738-a965-f1564416348c@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 19:26:17 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...cstar.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, han.xu@....com, robh@...nel.org,
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, dlan@...too.org,
	guodong@...cstar.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	spacemit@...ts.linux.dev, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: spi: fsl-qspi: support SpacemiT K1

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 01:06:46PM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
> On 10/20/25 12:39 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:

> > > +          - spacemit,k1-qspi

> > Are the newly added resets mandatory for the spacemit platform?

> This is interesting.  I never even tried it without specifying them.

> I just tried it, and at least on my system QSPI functioned without
> defining these resets.  I will ask SpacemiT about this.  If they are
> not needed I will omit the first patch (which added optional resets),
> and won't use them.

It might be safer to describe them, otherwise things are vulnerable to
issues like the bootloader not leaving things in a predictable state.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)