[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd-4oA1JV7zjrdKqw835ErnOU9ge7RYfbL7ij9X-OAY9hQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 14:27:45 +0900
From: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>
To: chenxiaosong.chenxiaosong@...ux.dev
Cc: stfrench@...rosoft.com, metze@...ba.org, pali@...nel.org,
smfrench@...il.com, sfrench@...ba.org, senozhatsky@...omium.org,
tom@...pey.com, pc@...guebit.org, ronniesahlberg@...il.com,
sprasad@...rosoft.com, bharathsm@...rosoft.com, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/22] smb: move file access permission bits
definitions to common/cifspdu.h
> +
> +#define CLIENT_SET_FILE_READ_RIGHTS (FILE_READ_DATA | FILE_READ_EA | FILE_WRITE_EA \
> + | FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES \
> + | FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES \
> + | DELETE | READ_CONTROL | WRITE_DAC \
> + | WRITE_OWNER | SYNCHRONIZE)
> +#define SERVER_SET_FILE_READ_RIGHTS (FILE_READ_DATA | FILE_READ_EA \
> + | FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES \
> + | DELETE | READ_CONTROL | WRITE_DAC \
> + | WRITE_OWNER | SYNCHRONIZE)
> +#define CLIENT_SET_FILE_WRITE_RIGHTS (FILE_WRITE_DATA | FILE_APPEND_DATA \
> + | FILE_READ_EA | FILE_WRITE_EA \
> + | FILE_READ_ATTRIBUTES \
> + | FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES \
> + | DELETE | READ_CONTROL | WRITE_DAC \
> + | WRITE_OWNER | SYNCHRONIZE)
> +#define SERVER_SET_FILE_WRITE_RIGHTS (FILE_WRITE_DATA | FILE_APPEND_DATA \
> + | FILE_WRITE_EA \
> + | FILE_DELETE_CHILD \
> + | FILE_WRITE_ATTRIBUTES \
> + | DELETE | READ_CONTROL | WRITE_DAC \
> + | WRITE_OWNER | SYNCHRONIZE)
What's the reason for moving it if the smb client and server don't share it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists