[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cad8f866-1655-4f4d-acf0-a974ad40ef39@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 10:53:56 +0100
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@...aro.org>,
André Draszik <andre.draszik@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, willmcvicker@...gle.com, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] exynos-acpm: add DVFS protocol and clock driver
On 10/20/25 8:03 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/10/2025 14:46, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>> Dependencies description:
>> All patches should go through the Samsung SoC tree.
>> The acpm-clk driver (#4) depends on the ACPM DVFS ops (#2).
>> If the clock subsystem needs to merge the new clock driver, it will
>> need an immutable tag with the 2 patches.
>>
>> The following DT patches depend on the bindings from #1:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20250924-acpm-dvfs-dt-v4-0-3106d49e03f5@linaro.org/
>
> You forgot to mention that this patchset adds new dtbs_check warnings,
> which are fixed ONLY after applying DT patches.
>
Indeed, sorry. I saw how you handled the dependencies in your tree with
the 2 dedicated branches, I'll keep in mind.
Cheers,
ta
Powered by blists - more mailing lists