lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aPeTppUgRC1wWQU9@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 17:07:34 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
	Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
	Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
	David Rhodes <david.rhodes@...rus.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
	Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
	Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
	Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
	Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
	Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
	Allan Nielsen <allan.nielsen@...rochip.com>,
	Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
	Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund@...rochip.com>,
	Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/29] bus: Introduce simple-platorm-bus

On Wed, Oct 15, 2025 at 09:13:53AM +0200, Herve Codina wrote:
> The simple-pm-bus driver handles several simple busses. When it is used
> with busses other than a compatible "simple-pm-bus", it doesn't populate
> its child devices during its probe.
> 
> This confuses fw_devlink and results in wrong or missing devlinks.
> 
> Once a driver is bound to a device and the probe() has been called,
> device_links_driver_bound() is called.
> 
> This function performs operation based on the following assumption:
>     If a child firmware node of the bound device is not added as a
>     device, it will never be added.
> 
> Among operations done on fw_devlinks of those "never be added" devices,
> device_links_driver_bound() changes their supplier.
> 
> With devices attached to a simple-bus compatible device, this change
> leads to wrong devlinks where supplier of devices points to the device
> parent (i.e. simple-bus compatible device) instead of the device itself
> (i.e. simple-bus child).
> 
> When the device attached to the simple-bus is removed, because devlinks
> are not correct, its consumers are not removed first.
> 
> In order to have correct devlinks created, make the simple-bus driver
> compliant with the devlink assumption and create its child devices
> during its probe.
> 
> Doing that leads to other issues due to the fact that simple-bus is
> closely related to of_platform_populate().
> 
> Indeed, of_platform_populate() can probe child devices if a simple-bus
> compatible node is detected. This behavior is expected by some drivers
> such as some MFD drivers. Those drivers perform some operations in their
> probe() but rely on the core (simple-mfd, simple-bus compatible) to
> populate child devices [1].
> 
> Avoiding recursive probing in of_platform_populate() and let the
> simple-bus driver probe its child devices will break some system.
> 
> For this reason, keep the current behavior of the simple-bus driver and
> of_platform_populate() as they are and introduce simple-platform-bus
> driver.
> 
> This driver doesn't interfere with of_platform_populate() and populates
> child devices during its probe() as expected by fw_devlink.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250715095201.1bcb4ab7@bootlin.com/

Link tag?

...

The below is simply wrong. The luck that you got no errors is due to CONFIG_OF
being bool and not tristate in Kconfig. I dunno if this driver ever gets the
'm' capability, but currently it uses tons of dead code (such as MODULE_*()
macros). Disregard of that, the proposed change should go to the separate
compilation unit at bare minimum.

...

>  module_platform_driver(simple_pm_bus_driver);

> +module_platform_driver(simple_platform_bus_driver);

^^^ WRONG!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ