linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] media: i2c: dw9719: add DT compatible and DW9718S support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e7086b14b7585ffe1215afbd85c15599e6c51714.camel@apitzsch.eu>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 21:56:46 +0200
From: André Apitzsch <git@...tzsch.eu>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
	 <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
	 <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>, 
 Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Val Packett
	 <val@...kett.cool>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] media: i2c: dw9719: add DT compatible and
 DW9718S support

Hi Krzysztof,

Am Montag, dem 20.10.2025 um 22:45 +0200 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> On 20/10/2025 22:40, André Apitzsch wrote:
> > >  .../bindings/media/i2c/dongwoon,dw9719.yaml        |  88
> > > +++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/media/i2c/dw9719.c                         | 110
> > > +++++++++++++++++----
> > >  2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > > ---
> > > base-commit: 846bd2225ec3cfa8be046655e02b9457ed41973e
> > > change-id: 20250709-dw9719-8a8822efc1b1
> > > 
> > 
> > Gentle ping.
> 
> Please apply the patch and run checkpatch. Probably you received
> checkpatch warnings from media patchwork, no?
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

I run "b4 prep --check" before submitting the series and it didn't
complain about the wrong separator, that you have spotted in patch 1.
There was also no email from media patchwork. Should it send one if
checks fail?

Best regards,
André