linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] media: i2c: dw9719: add DT compatible and DW9718S support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <baaa2da7-47cd-41c4-b03e-a413618fba9f@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 22:06:15 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: André Apitzsch <git@...tzsch.eu>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
 <conor+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
 Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Val Packett <val@...kett.cool>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] media: i2c: dw9719: add DT compatible and DW9718S
 support

On 21/10/2025 21:56, André Apitzsch wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> Am Montag, dem 20.10.2025 um 22:45 +0200 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 20/10/2025 22:40, André Apitzsch wrote:
>>>>  .../bindings/media/i2c/dongwoon,dw9719.yaml        |  88
>>>> +++++++++++++++++
>>>>  drivers/media/i2c/dw9719.c                         | 110
>>>> +++++++++++++++++----
>>>>  2 files changed, 178 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>> ---
>>>> base-commit: 846bd2225ec3cfa8be046655e02b9457ed41973e
>>>> change-id: 20250709-dw9719-8a8822efc1b1
>>>>
>>>
>>> Gentle ping.
>>
>> Please apply the patch and run checkpatch. Probably you received
>> checkpatch warnings from media patchwork, no?
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
> 
> I run "b4 prep --check" before submitting the series and it didn't
> complain about the wrong separator, that you have spotted in patch 1.
> There was also no email from media patchwork. Should it send one if
> checks fail?
No, please follow my advice. Apply the patch. Check the result.

Best regards,
Krzysztof