[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251021230328.GA21554@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 20:03:28 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@...el.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...dia.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
intel-xe@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@...el.com>,
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@...el.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/26] vfio/xe: Add vendor-specific vfio_pci driver for
Intel graphics
On Sat, Oct 11, 2025 at 09:38:47PM +0200, Michał Winiarski wrote:
> + /*
> + * "STOP" handling is reused for "RUNNING_P2P", as the device doesn't have the capability to
> + * selectively block p2p DMA transfers.
> + * The device is not processing new workload requests when the VF is stopped, and both
> + * memory and MMIO communication channels are transferred to destination (where processing
> + * will be resumed).
> + */
> + if ((cur == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING && new == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_STOP) ||
> + (cur == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING && new == VFIO_DEVICE_STATE_RUNNING_P2P)) {
> + ret = xe_sriov_vfio_stop(xe_vdev->pf, xe_vdev->vfid);
This comment is not right, RUNNING_P2P means the device can still
receive P2P activity on it's BAR. Eg a GPU will still allow read/write
to its framebuffer.
But it is not initiating any new transactions.
> +static void xe_vfio_pci_migration_init(struct vfio_device *core_vdev)
> +{
> + struct xe_vfio_pci_core_device *xe_vdev =
> + container_of(core_vdev, struct xe_vfio_pci_core_device, core_device.vdev);
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(core_vdev->dev);
> +
> + if (!xe_sriov_vfio_migration_supported(pdev->physfn))
> + return;
> +
> + /* vfid starts from 1 for xe */
> + xe_vdev->vfid = pci_iov_vf_id(pdev) + 1;
> + xe_vdev->pf = pdev->physfn;
No, this has to use pci_iov_get_pf_drvdata, and this driver should
never have a naked pf pointer flowing around.
The entire exported interface is wrongly formed:
+bool xe_sriov_vfio_migration_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+int xe_sriov_vfio_wait_flr_done(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int vfid);
+int xe_sriov_vfio_stop(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int vfid);
+int xe_sriov_vfio_run(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int vfid);
+int xe_sriov_vfio_stop_copy_enter(struct pci_dev *pdev, unsigned int vfid);
None of these should be taking in a naked pci_dev, it should all work
on whatever type the drvdata is.
And this gross thing needs to go away too:
> + if (pdev->is_virtfn && strcmp(pdev->physfn->dev.driver->name, "xe") == 0)
> + xe_vfio_pci_migration_init(core_vdev);
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists