lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEsegw23-N75QqUWfS_e5TuTX1122n7B8dgZXch=z_Y96A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 11:25:40 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com, eperezma@...hat.com, 
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 19/19] virtio_ring: add in order support

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 5:13 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 03:10:03PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > +
> > +     if (vq->batch_last.id == last_used) {
> > +             vq->batch_last.id = num;
> > +             *len = vq->batch_last.len;
> > +     } else
> > +             *len = vq->packed.desc_state[last_used].total_len;
>
>
> another coding style violation
>

I've fixed both virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split_in_order and
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_packed_in_order.

Thanks


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ