linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sophgo: add top syscon device for cv18xx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c2b4zfjfqqorku2oznpwhvk4mwfwv4sypv5qxi2pk4xsxknhnz@o6euptpneeqk>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 17:35:12 +0800
From: Longbin Li <looong.bin@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Chen Wang <unicorn_wang@...look.com>, Inochi Amaoto <inochiama@...il.com>, 
	Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, 
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, 
	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>, Thomas Bonnefille <thomas.bonnefille@...tlin.com>, 
	Ze Huang <huangze@...t.edu.cn>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, sophgo@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] riscv: sophgo: add top syscon device for cv18xx

On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 12:04:06PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 20/10/2025 10:38, Longbin Li wrote:
> > Add top syscon device bindings related DTS change for CV1800.
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 
> >   - Add ranges property.
> >   - Use proper regex in patternProperties.
> >   - Add complete example including child nodes.
> > 
> > Changes in v1:
> > 
> >   - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251012022555.6240-1-looong.bin@gmail.com/
> > 
> > Changed by RFC:
> > 
> >   - https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250611082452.1218817-1-inochiama@gmail.com/
> 
> 
> So this is v3, not v2. We do not count from 0, -1 or -2 (of you have
> three RFCs). Please start using b4, so you will get it right. Otherwise
> how can we compare versions between v1 and RFC? Try yourself with `b4 diff`.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

Sorry about that, I will fix it next commit. Thanks!