[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20251021-distaste-antelope-d7354c0c35c0@spud>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 10:47:30 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Valentina.FernandezAlanis@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Microchip mpfs/pic64gx pinctrl
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 11:05:53PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 4:36 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> > Following from my RFC recently [0] I've got a v2 here that's implemented
> > the change from using the pinmux property to using functions and groups
> > that you asked for Linus.
>
> Overall I'm very happy with what I see, I see there are some comments
> and my only comment would be to add
>
> depends on ARCH_MICROCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
>
> on the drivers so they get some proper compile testing, and I expect
> we can apply v3.
Oh, that's a silly one to forget about. I'll do that and just delete the
TODO line that I had in there, since you've not objected to the macro
use.
Thanks,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists