[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdadawJmrED-dPpnm+MKD1ndt4V86GOebkiQzU=d+-vHjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 23:05:53 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Valentina.FernandezAlanis@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Microchip mpfs/pic64gx pinctrl
On Tue, Oct 14, 2025 at 4:36 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> Following from my RFC recently [0] I've got a v2 here that's implemented
> the change from using the pinmux property to using functions and groups
> that you asked for Linus.
Overall I'm very happy with what I see, I see there are some comments
and my only comment would be to add
depends on ARCH_MICROCHIP || COMPILE_TEST
on the drivers so they get some proper compile testing, and I expect
we can apply v3.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists